I think the RD-8 looks great! I would like to have one.
I don’t really have a dog in this fight but it does strike me that some of Behringer’s cloning practices seem more acceptable than others. Namely when:

  1. The original company will not reissue a synth/drum machine/whatever.
  2. Or the company’s ‘reissues’ of analogue gear are actually VAs.
  3. When a reasonable time has passed and the original company has profited from its IP, R&D.

In those cases, I think Behringer are filling a legitimate gap in the market.

On the other hand, cloning new gear feature for feature seems highly dubious. e.g. Mother 32 -> Crave, or even more blatant copies of outboard with the same casing, interface, etc.

4 Likes

+1 for mentioning Flashlight. But I think the Grandmother has its charms too.

time to bring back the Radio Shack Realistic™ MG-1?
(It was my first analog synth and I learned a ton from it)

6 Likes

So they have free range over the entire Roland back-catalog?

Hopefully this doesn’t come across as snarky towards you. It’s just a fun observation. I would probably buy a Buno…

Negative stereotypes mixed in with a little projected self-loathing.

Hey,

I am looking for you guys opinion after reading the posts.

I have a chance to buy a Voyager XL after a mood improving New Year PPI refund :slight_smile:

I just checked out the entire “Clone” lineups price and aside from the deep mind the cost of them “all” would be £1000 less than the XL.

I do have a collection of synths/samplers and this is mos def GAS but hey ho…

So my questions are:

Buy all 9 of the clones?
Or the XL ?

I do have polsynths/mono’s already

Answers on a de la soul 6x4 sheet of paper please

peace

2 Likes

My advice: tread water :wink:

1 Like

I am treading pete, it’s burning a hole though :slight_smile:

maybe just buy 3 of em…

1 Like

This is sacrilege to say, I know, but I had a play with all the top end synths that were on display at Synthfest (aside from the Colossus, dammit) and the most impressive one for me was the Novation Summit. I was absolutely floored by that unit. I liked the Ob-6 a lot too, as it goes, but I’d be getting a Summit if I was in the market (or a Peak, as I don’t really have the space for the Summit).

9 Likes

what is your existing collection?

The Peak (and Summit)is a great synth.Not only it sounds really good, but it is also a pleasure to program

4 Likes

Um… …maybe? :slightly_smiling_face:
I did say some practices are more acceptable than others, not that I condone them, so that’s my get out of jail card. But yeah, wouldn’t surprise me if they went through the whole X0X range, and the keyboards.

I’m committed to my depth year but if I feel the same way I do about a Peak this time next year I’ll already have ordered one

1 Like

synth wise: 101, SK30, 106, CS15, Polysix, Prophet 6, Prodigy and samplers i’ll leave out I suppose

m

2 Likes

hey,

thought about the ob6 and there is one for sale too nearby

the Xl is massive and 3.2K is more than i’d like to pay for anything!

m

1 Like

Not Behringer related, but talking about remakes, just saw this one and I am very stoked because the original one was one of my fav synths ever.

1 Like

Most of the Behringer clones have an advantage for me that many other synths, regardless of price or type do not - CV inputs. That makes microtuning possible. With few exceptions, gear with only midi or USB data inputs is locked to 12TET.

Here’s hoping that the Wavestate has minilogue XD style microtuning…

1 Like

The original Wavestation features microtonal functionality

Well, kind of. It’s only 12 note octave scales with +/- 99 cents per note. The minilogue / monologue / prologue OTOH have full tuning adjustment for each key.

We really need another word for synths that just have 12 note octave retuning.

the summit is a beautiful synth but I don’t really have space for one either. I’m borrowing a friend of mine’s Peak and love it. It is enough to keep me busy for sure.

2 Likes