#8

Ah well last night I was using the NoteSeq module from JW as my main sequencer (always my goto when thinking polyphonically), and then I also had two ADDR-SEQ modules from Bog Audio for adding some additional notes every now and then. I love the ADDR-SEQ because they’re tiny, simple, and useful.

I also use the Bene sequencer from dBiz alot because it maps rather nicely to the Midi Fighter Twister (Bene is sort of a MN Rene clone).

Polyphony and MIDI sequencing with VCV is really fun. You can get pretty weird with it. One of the things I like doing is taking the polyphonic gate output from NoteSeq, splitting it into 4, delaying each of those 4 split triggers by different amounts (or maybe alternating amounts care of an ADDR-SEQ), and then merging those 4 delayed triggers back with everything else before sending out to a MIDI port. It basically splits apart chords coming out of NoteSeq into little strums and or subsequences.

1 Like
#9

Also, I should add that these monome modules have totally sold me on getting a real grid to use with VCV Rack. I often use the meadowphysics module with the virtual grid.

3 Likes
#10

I use VCV (@ht73 I use an ES-8 to patch out to an analog filter), Ableton Live (mostly for max for live), and Bitwig (excellent MPE support) at different times for different reasons. VCV gets an increasing share of my time. Lacks an arrangement view though.

#11

I would be curious to hear what kind of stuff you ended up coming up with and maybe hearing about your process a bit more. I’ve barely dipped my route in to Vcv track and have found it intriguing, but complex. I was probably going to move over to the iPad fork, miRack in the next week or two and begin experimenting.

#12

I’ve added this to my template, works beautifully.

1 Like
#13

For sure! Has zilch to do with an arrangement view (which is still a different thing from a clip launcher, which is still a different thing from a sequential switch).

I don’t mean to suggest arrangement is impossible in VCV. I just mean you can’t use it to place audio clips on a horizontal timeline, and that’s what most people think of when you say “DAW”.

#14

I use Reaktor quite a lot. If I’m using Blocks, I prefer to use it outside a DAW as being closer to a modular paradigm (YMMV on that, I guess) - try to rely more on modulation & sequencing from the Blocks themselves etc.

here are various downsides (lack of straightforward multi-track recording, lower sample rate recordings internally etc). Main benefit (other than different way of thinking as noted by people previously) is freeing up CPU not having to run a DAW at the same time (although obviously offset by Reaktor not being multi-core).

#15

Would love to try these out. Any help/good online guides that can help a git noob (on windows) make sense of the instructions?

How do I use this?

How do I use this?

The master branch is now compatible with Rack 1.0. For Rack 0.6.2, check the v0.6 branch.

We now have experimental CI builds on the Releases page. These builds are built against the prerelease Rack SDK version 1.dev.439b3f6 .

This plugin has been built and tested on the following platforms, though bugs and issues still exist.

  • Mac OS X 10.13
  • Windows 10
  • Ubuntu 16.04

To build with the Rack SDK:

  • Clone this repo.

$ git clone https://github.com/Dewb/monome-rack

  • Change into the monome-rack folder and clone the plugin’s submodules with git submodule update --init --recursive

$ cd monome-rack $ git submodule update --init --recursive

  • Download the Rack SDK.

$ curl -O https://vcvrack.com/downloads/Rack-SDK-1.dev.439b3f6.zip $ unzip Rack-SDK-1.dev.439b3f6.zip

  • Build with make .

$ RACK_DIR=$(PWD)/Rack-SDK make

#16

Download the windows zip file under Assets on this page: https://github.com/Dewb/monome-rack/releases

And put it in the vcv rack plugins folder as described here: https://vcvrack.com/manual/Installing.html#installing-plugins-not-available-on-the-plugin-manager

I’m not at my windows machine at the moment to verify but that should be all you need to do.

3 Likes
#17

Sure, I can post something a bit later hopefully.

As for the complexity, I find it much more comfortable when I limit how many modules I have in any given patch. I enforce this by setting my zoom level to 164%…on my 27" display this limits me to two rows/6u and what looks like 104-ish HP. It’s also easier on my aging eyes.

It’s so very tempting to right-click and go searching through the enormous module library to try and find fun new shiny things, but I definitely get more stuff done when I restrict how many modules I have on screen and then focus on really exploring what fits in that limited space.

#18

Easy as that! Thank you thank you! :smiley:

#19

I would consider that a strength actually.

Which is not to say linear development is ‘bad’, just that there’s no reason it can’t be done in a fully modular setup. Maybe we just don’t have the right modules.

How much of this is best done ‘live’, and how much aided by other modules and pre-programmed content is a question that has yet to be settled. Perhaps the surface has not really been scratched.

It does surface the question as to the best arrangement of event schedulers, mutes, and other automation controls. How much of this can be collected into a single ‘arranger module’ and what would the interface be? Certainly the idea of a ‘module’ can and should go far beyond just something with jacks and knobs. Or how much of this can be broken down into smaller and simpler modules? Then, what else is possible for those who wish to use these arranger components in a more generative fashion? How also can such thinking and development influence hardware design for those who prefer to stay in that world?

#20

I feel horizontal arrangement of audio clips on a timeline is pretty orthogonal to the modular mindset.

I think it’s OK to have different mindsets (and toolsets) at different times for different reasons.

My workflow (when using modular systems) is: record a bunch of audio and either call it “done”, or, occasionally, bring the audio into a timeline view for a little cut/paste/edit. I typically don’t enjoy timeline editing (feels like using excel to make music) but there are times when it’s easier than the alternatives (if I keep it to the bare minimum).

#21

Here’s a quick example I just put together on my lunch hour. MIDI out from VCV Rack to an instance of Operator in Ableton Live. It looks like this:

unnamed
unnamed.jpg800×291 68.1 KB

Pitches from the NoteSeq16 are sent directly to Operator in Ableton Live. The gates are being split apart and delayed independently before being merged back together. The timing for each of the delays applied to the gates is being modulated by an LFO. The first and fourth gates are being subjected to probability by the Bernouli gate. The ADDR-SEQ is sending velocities to Operator (mapped to the volume of the modulator in the FM algo).

Sounds like this so far:

If I continue with this tonight, the first thing I’d do would be to tighten up the timing difference of the gate delays. But hey, I gotta get back to work.

Oh also, this all runs smoothly on my 2010 (!) Macbook Pro. Core 2 Duo haha. I’m pretty sure if I tried to put some DSP stuff in VCV Rack everything would blow up.

7 Likes
#22

Wow… This is wonderful. This is real inspiration for me to get in to this. Modular’s are just tough to get in to a learn. VCV, having very little limitations get even MORE difficult. But I want to experiment with recreating what you’ve got here and just pay attention to the process. I really enjoy the result.

I have also downloaded miRack on my iPad. Basically just a portable version of VCV rack. Would be worth porting the midi through to some of the great softsynths on my ipad, or even to garage band… I’ve had a thing for portable electronic music making that allows me to get away from my desk, hence the OPZ, iPad and Norns being my main forms of music making.

Might, when I actually get a chance to sit at my computer/iPad and try this stuff, send you a question or two, if thats cool. You’ve had beautiful results and I’d love to continue picking your brain.

2 Likes
#23

I suspected I was being lazy by not elaborating, sorry about that :frowning:
In any case, that’s the setup I use to move parts, and it works a treat.

1 Like
#24

Yep, I found it impossible to keep to the Fundamental set of modules when I started out, which probably meant it took me a lot longer to know what was going on in some of the modules I was using :slight_smile:

As always, there are a bunch of lovely people on YouTube publishing beginner’s guides regularly: Omri Cohen, Modular Curiosity, Federico Soler Fernández, just off the top of my head.

3 Likes
#25

There are certainly some great looking tutorials out there. I appreciate the names and will look at what they’ve put together. Sometimes I find it easier to play with stuff that others have built, rebuilding it to get a since off what does what. Often times tutorials just give you the basics but can be a bit hard to pin down what kinds of music can be made that way.

I’m excited and motivated to dig further in to it. This falls under the same interests as orca in helping me generate melodies and melodic rhythms since these are often times the weakest parts of my music flow at the moment. All really great tools for building something one might not come up with on their own!

#26

When I patch in VCV, I do it with Omri Cohen’s voice in my head. I suspect this condition may be permanent.

5 Likes
#27

very nice…

3 Likes