I’m sure I’ve mentioned this at least once, but I worked as a non-coding software product manager from 1998 until 2013, so we’re in the same clan.
I see how you could infer this, but that was not my intention. I’m not suggesting that the nice people who make these wonderful products should adopt a strategy to capture and expand the “post-chasm” marketplace, I’m just saying that different segments have different needs when it comes to interacting with technology.
I agree with you that this new offering is “perfectly in line with past products”, and that’s good! What I also sense is that there is a substantial effort on the part of the entire monome team to make their documentation more accessible and organized, which is also good.
What I hoped to communicate was that technical products positioned for use by non-technical people require a different level of hand-holding than the same products positioned to technical people. The best example of this is the reliance on GitHub - non-technical people see that as an impenetrable fog, which is a perspective that causes a bit of cognitive dissonance with technical people, to whom GitHub makes perfect sense.
I’m not trying to set up an “us vs them” strawman by any means. I’m just encouraging the community to understand that it is now made up of individuals with somewhat divergent perspectives when it comes to technology and the desire to do technical things in the pursuit of musical outcomes. These communities can learn a lot from each other, and that’s part of the magic of this community: it is a wonderful example of 1+1 > 2 thinking, and I feel privileged to have the opportunity to participate in it.