Wait, just because something has a feedback system that doesn’t make it a cybernetic patch. The main premise of cybernetics is to allow for a system to autocorrect itself. It’s explicit in the name of the field. The control is mainly achieved by way of feeding back information from the environment to the system, in a similar way to how humans work, which was the main idea behind Wiener’s theory.
So in order to have autocorrection the system must first have a goal.
Plugging your reverb to feed back on itself isn’t cybernetic at all. A reverse envelope shape stemming from an envelope follower, reducing your feedback before it goes above a certain threshold, that is a cybernetic patch.
Also, while we’re at it, chaotic doesn’t mean random, or non repeating, and algorithmic and generative are not the same thing. We’re mixing terminology here.
For example a generative patch can be algorithmic, and it can be chaotic, but not necessarily. Check the Logistic equation (documented on the Doepfer site and elsewhere) for a good basic understanding of a simple Chaotic system which can easily be patched on a small case.