I’d heard about a possible sequel to Blade Runner some years ago. I don’t recall when, but it caught my attention because Blade Runner is one of my favorite movies. At the time there were few details, and anything anyone said would be meaningless anyway, given how things tend to work out. One thought stayed with me: I did not want this to be more of the same.
Much as I loved the original I really do not want more of it. I don’t want any sequel to be some version of “the missing two hours from the director’s extended remix release.”
About a week ago I came across an article that posted a letter sent by James Cameron to HR Giger.
Cameron directed the sequel to the film Alien. You can read the letter here: http://www.hrgiger.com/james_cameron.htm
Cameron was in much the same position as Denis Villeneuve is in now. A chance to extend a story-line placed in a well-defined, and fairly iconic, universe. What to do? More of the same? Or try a new path?
I expect many fans of Blade Runner want a continuation of that film noir, damp & shadowy, claustrophobic Ur-cyberpunk realm.
Not me. The sequel is supposed to place some decades on from the original. Things change. Climate, for one. Where the first was dark and wet I now want a film that’s hot, dry, spread out. Harsh lights, arid climate. In place of the often languid synths of Vangelis I’d want something more tribal, harder, noisier.
Hence my Los Angeles Desert Overture
https://soundcloud.com/neurogami/los-angeles-desert-overture-disquiet0243