When is this 2018?
People still griping about Digitakt song mode!
Digitakt does not need a song mode.
Play The Thing!

I make every track Digitakt only.
I love it.
If you embrace Digitakt for what it is.
You will love also.

go visit

there is a lot about Digitakt discussion there.

much love to @mzero

6 Likes

It was just to allow me to use it when I’m playing piano. Don’t have a spare hand to change patterns.

But I’ve embraced longer patterns and extreme use of the conditional trigs. If all else fails I’ll get a Machinedrum to trigger the changes.

1 Like

If you want a device to fill the role of drum machine or sampler with some sort of song sequencing of patterns… Digitakt will just keep letting you down.

Sure, you can using the quick pattern sequence mode – but it is awkward. You can sequence the patterns from another device using program changes. You can even try the trick of routing MIDI out to in, but there are dragons there…

Even if you get pattern sequencing to work in your set up, the rest of the Digitakt isn’t designed for it: In particular, the sound kits are per pattern, and not shared - so if you tweak a sound in one of the patterns of a song, you’ll need to hand copy it to the others. The main mixer and compressor have the same issue.

In short - it isn’t set up to do this task.

4 Likes

Hmm. Interesting. I need to explore further.

I’ve grown attached to it, so it’s staying. But at some point a Machinedrum may join it.

1 Like

I love the Digitakt and use it as my primary drum machine + sequencer… but yeah I’m in total agreement with you there. The more advanced sequencing / song mode I can live without as I mostly do my final arranging in Ableton anyway.

But the kits per pattern and not per bank (or project) is for me the number one feature that is missing from the unit. Over on the elektronauts forum I’ve seen almost an equal number arguing for as against it… But I would at least love to have the option to decide per project whether the kits should be shared or not amongst patterns.
I mostly work around it by using conditional trigs over a single pattern, but I notice that most of my projects end up being just a single pattern on a single bank as a result with less variation than I would like. This really is an instance of the hardware dictating the musical outcome.

I tend to build a first pattern then copy and paste, then edit the pasted one. So I’ve never run into this.

1 Like

Yeah - when I do occasionally venture into using several patterns I do the same.

But then inevitably I want to change some of the sound parameters, which means I have to remember to change them in whichever pattern slot I’ve used the same sample(s) (if I want to keep consistency between them).

I’ve heard some people use pattern 16 for e.g. as their base pattern for manipulating all the sounds + samples and then they just paste the sound params back into the patterns they have on 1-15. Which is the best workaround I’ve come across for keeping consistency.

But what I realllly love to do is make modifications to sounds on the fly while jamming. And this is where the biggest problem for me occurs. If I have something like a simple pattern chain A, B, A, B and I’m making live changes to the sounds when it jumps between the two because the kits are in no way connected the changes in A aren’t reflected in B and its quite noticeable when moving between the patterns as it really disrupts the flow of the sound. This I haven’t found a good solution for aside from 1.) not using multiple patterns or 2.) not making live edits when pattern chaining or 3.) not caring about the differences. All workable, compromising solutions. But makes me lose a bit of the pure fun in live playing.

3 Likes

(3 yrs later)

Wow, your post left me me really wanting a Digitakt now.

So it’s more drum machine than groove box? I have a Novation Circuit and had wondered if there might be some redundancy for me. I’m aware of the functional differences between the two, but I was getting hung up on thinking of it as essentially a nicer groove box with direct sampling capabilities.

Personally I’d say if you only use the Digitakt as a drum machine you’d be missing out. It does wonderful things when you use it for full compositions.

3 Likes

Last night I spent an hour playing with one sample. Just seeing what one tiny sample could be turned into. It’s an amazing box.

I’m starting to realise it’s more of an instrument than I thought. And maybe I need a sequencer to control it, rather than it be the brain.

6 Likes

While the point made about the kit structure is very much valid, I too would encourage looking past that to find a really fun instrument. Possibilities abound.

1 Like

Last night was typical for me: I played some live electronic improv with three other musicians. They played MicroFreak, Minilougue XD, and an OP-1. I played just Digitakt. For each of the seven pieces we did, I started with a blank pattern - and did the whole 10 to 15 min. piece with just that one pattern. My only prep going in was to fill up the sample bank of the project with about 85 selected samples - about ⅓ factory, a ⅓ some sample packs I like, and rest my own things.

I sometimes use other things with the Digitakt: MicroMonsta, PreenFM, or the Circuit. I have the DT sequence the first two. If using the Circuit, I just slave the Circuit to the DT - but they each sequence themselves.

I also usually use a MIDI fader controller mapped to the volumes and mutes on the DT, so I have quick access to that at all times. I use a Launchpad Pro in note grid mode to play the synths and occasionally the DT (those factory single cycle wave forms make great bass lines!). I usually have some downstream effects as well.

Indeed, Digitakt doesn’t exactly fill the role of traditional drum machine, nor traditional sampler. It can serve as both - but it shines when played as an instrument on it’s own terms.

9 Likes

Absolutely–it’s made for hands on play. I did a 40 minute live set with just my Digitakt and each song aside from one was done with a single pattern. When I use it in the studio I’ll record multiple full song-length passes where I play the thing hands on, improvising alongside whatever’s already recorded, and then cut out the best parts from each pass to compile the song together. If I try and program the thing to play itself, or have it run a sequence while I try and manage other instruments, it just gets stale. That’s why a lack of song mode hasn’t ever bothered me–it would just lead to longer passages of staleness.

6 Likes

I have a Digitakt and mostly use it as a drum machine. One frustrating missing feature is sample choking across different tracks. It can make hi-hat programming more laborious than it needs to be. Not sure why they didn’t implement that. There’s workarounds, but I’ve not discovered one that doesn’t require going in after a live record and manually editing.

I dont have a digitakt anymore, but couldnt you simply have oh and hh on the same track and use some p-locks ? One would automatically cut the other wouldnt it ?

Yes, you can, but it’s not intuitive and not possible (as far as I have found) to record in this way live. You have to go in and manually edit. Perhaps i’m missing something obvious?

Came back to the Digitakt recently after picking up a Blackbox, and I find their relationship an interesting one. The BB takes care of a lot of stuff I miss on the DT, like slicing and synced recording (and choke groups!), but I think that despite - or possibly because of - the BB’s touchscreen, the DT still beats it in terms of usability, and I much prefer the DT for creative sampling. And sequencing, obviously, because the BB is still quite basic there.

As is often the case with Elektron gear, I find myself wishing I could fuse a couple of features into it from the BB. But I can’t, so I have to remember that the Digitakt is something of a playful machine, and in many ways a puzzle - it wants you to be hands on, and it wants you to come up with creative solutions. It’d be nice to be able to choke hi-hats, but you can’t. So I’ll do something like sample open and closed as a two-part chain, and use a synced LFO to switch them (or to affect the envelope decay on a single sound, etc). I probably won’t get the results I expected, but there’s a good chance I’ll get something more interesting.

It’s not a workflow you want all the time, and often you have to approach the DT with its limitations firmly in mind. But usually I find it compensates for them well enough. I also have a Mk1 Rytm, and I often wonder if the Mk2 is the ‘complete’ Digitakt - but it’s safely outside my impulse purchase range, which is probably for the best.

3 Likes

This reminds me of the time I got a Octatrack as an “upgrade” to the DT.

And for sure, it has more features and possibilities. But the limitations of the DT makes it more opinionated, and as a result, more intuitive. I enjoy the Digitakt as a playful sampler. And with overbridge released, I’m happy to complement it with a computer anyway.

6 Likes

20 characters of joy

6 Likes

Has anybody here used their Digitakt with a CV to MIDI module like the Befaco VCMC? I’ve been looking at various looper modules this week and I’m wondering if it would be better to just add more modulation options to my DT. Don’t want to be surprised by finding out that it doesn’t get along well with the VCMC or something though.

1 Like