Hans Haacke on Generative Systems
…make something which experiences, reacts to its environment, changes, is nonstable…
…make something indeterminate, which always looks different, the shape of which cannot be predicted precisely…
…make something which cannot ‘perform’ without the assistance of its environment…
…make something which reacts to light and temperature changes, is subject to air currents and depends, in its functioning, on the forces of gravity…
…make something which the ‘spectator’ handles, with which he plays and thus animates…
…make something which lives in time and makes the ‘spectator’ experience time…
…articulate: something natural…
– Hans Haacke, Cologne 1965
lets consider generative art not as something exclusively digital/algrithmic (and even technological).
how about graphical notation in music? a language without specified semantics and without ‘standardised’ means of interpretation using human experience and cultural/theoretical knowledge as a complex factor in the generation of its interpretation. and how about free improvised music/dance/painting/etc.
shouldn’t we consider all art to be generative? aren’t we generative art systems, set into motion with a certain set of rules given by education, culture, history, politics, media etc?