You’re very right on this. Maybe it comes from the ways we typically consume the media around modular? Lots of pictures and videos of a person showing off their tight minimal ambient rack, or a person with a monster case making feature length tracks, when in reality, most people are probably in between.
But you’re right on aquiring a bunch of small cases. Surprised expandable cases aren’t more of a thing (I guess the Moog and Frap skifs can be linked, same with Mantises). I DIYed my case and made it easy to add another box ontop and still reach the busboard below. Seen some 3D print stuff developing as well.

I started in June and have filled 80-90% of a 2x84 case. Patching and the quality/texture of CV interested me more than unlocking new capabilities, so I mostly ignored the “clear goals required” pablum. “First contact with the enemy” is spot-on. My purchases took a few odd, compulsive twists, mostly due to interest in DIY kits. I’m ready to let go of 3 or 4 modules already, simply due to details/preferences I overlooked as well as freeing HP - I don’t want a bigger case yet. This all feels pretty natural. Planning was the most painful bit, and mitigating that is worth losing $20 on the odd awkward fit here and there.

Limits are crucial and they can be anything: for me, I’m staying mostly (cheap-ish) analog and I plan to add only what I can’t code/upload into Crow. I like sparse, so less happening at a time is just fine. I enjoy my nearly-full case, and I did when I only had 4 modules (Maths, Cold Mac, Sampling Modulator, and Dual Xfade, maybe?) The brain bending, perspective shifting, and problem solving are almost as fun as the random surprises.

I would warn against overlooking quirks in case power discrepancies, though - I wasted some postage due to thinking my 3 Sisters was busted when it just needed fuses swapped :slight_smile: I’m glad I got that sorted - I use it in every patch!

3 Likes

Sorry in advance for this simple issue with my Mother 32.

This has been driving me nuts trying to figure out a way to do this…I’ve got the M32’s LFO set for a decent amount of tremelo. All I want to do is use CV from somewhere to modulate the VCF Mod Amount so that the LFO (Trem) comes in and out slowly.

Was thinking I should be able to use the LFO TRI out from another M32 to do this, but there isn’t a set CV patch in for the VCF Mod Amount sadly.

There has to be a way to do this, right? What am I missing? Do I need to look outside of the M32 patchbay options?

If I understand right, you need two LFOs: one that is faster, which determines your tremolo, and a slower one that would bring the level of that first LFO up and down.

If you have a second M32, or an LFO from somewhere else, you can use the VC Mix on your first M32 to create the kind of signal you’re describing. Put your tremolo LFO (presumably coming from your first M32) into Mix 1, and nothing into Mix 2. Use the second, slower LFO into VC Mix Ctrl; this will cause the VC Mix output to oscillate between nothing (Mix 2) and the tremolo signal (Mix 1). Then route VC Mix out to what you’re trying to modulate.

I don’t think there is a way to do what you’re describing with a single M32, without a second LFO; but the raising and lowering of the tremolo control you’re describing can otherwise be handled on-board.

(I no longer have a Mother 32 but I’m looking at the panel. This should work!)

2 Likes

Does everyone’s ES-0 get pretty hot almost immediately after it’s turned on. I’ve got mine in a 7U performance case, and I can immediately feel it’s hot just by touching the front of it. I’m already a bit worried about ventilation on the performance case, so I just want to make sure everything’s as expected.

This isn’t a specific Eurorack question, but I am hoping folks can help me make sure I’m thinking about voltage manipulation in the right way.

Problem I am trying to solve: I have some Buchla & I have some Serge, and I want them to play together better.

Sequencing (so 1v/oct <-> 1.2v/oct) is a non issue for me since I’m using analogue sequencers.

What I’m left with primarily is wanting to send gates & modulation in both directions. Gates are most import, since I am sequencing in both, and I would love for events in one format to trigger events in the other.

My understanding is that the incompatibility is that gates in Serge are 5V; and in Buchla they are 10V. Am I right to think of this primarily as an offset & attenuation problem?

There are of course modules that solve this problem in the Buchla space, but they are expensive for what they provide in my opinion. I no longer have a Euro setup, but given the relative affordability of small Eurorack cases these days, I’m think it might make more sense to get one of those and some attenuators and offset modules and use a format jumbler in-between. I might even have a happy ending kit lying around somewhere.

If anyone else has any specific experience solving this problem I’d love to hear about it, or general feedback about the conclusion I’m coming to is welcome as well :bowing_man:

Not Eurorack specific but I have a (probably very basic) question about noise floor, attenutation and amplification.

If you attenuate an audio signal which is at level X down to level Y, and then later re-amplify that signal back to level X…

  1. is the noise floor of single Y reduced in comparison to X?
  2. is the noise floor of the signal the same as it was originally after re-amplification?

It really depends on where the noise is introduced relative to the attenuation and amplification. Usually noise is at a constant level regardless of the level of your signal, so a lower signal level would result in a worse signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Ideally your should run your signal as hot as possible (without introducing unacceptable distortion) during the noisiest parts of your signal chain.

No matter where your worst SNR is in the signal chain, it’s impossible to improve it via attenuation and re-amplification later on.

1 Like

Thanks for this - to clarfiy, my intention isn’t to attempt to improve SNR via this process, I’m just keen to understand what effect attenuation/amplification actually has on SNR ie- does it make it worse?

The only added noise would be from the amplifiers themselves. The noise which was already “printed” onto your signal will remain constant relative to the signal.

2 Likes

Perhaps I’m missing something obvious, but are there any Pulplogic-sized 1U modules for line in? I’m drawing a blank on Modulargrid. I’m currently using 1/4"-to-3.5mm adapters, which is fine but fiddly, so I’d prefer having a nice module to plug straight into.

Pulplogic themselves seem to have opted to offer a jumbler/adapter, but no actual line-in tile. Which is odd, because they have that Outputs module. Intellijel has it, but I guess that won’t work for you. :thinking:

1 Like

Ah, that adapter is probably just what I need! (It’s labeled as “utility” on MG, but not “external”, so I was overlooking it.) Pairing that with a gain tile seems like it completes the package.

1 Like

Attenuation or amplification attenuates or amplifies the entire signal, noise and all, and introduces any self noise added by the module/connections involved in carrying out that process. In particular the signal to noise ratio remains virtually the same; only virtually as the self noise I mentioned makes it (probably not discernibly) worse, meaning more noisey.

2 Likes

hi all, i was wondering if anyone can reccomend a module that converts aux audio to CV. as far as i understand make noise dynamix does this, and the 4MS SMR kind of does. looking for some other solutions!

also, if anyone has any decent/comprehensive guides to a dreadbox utopia i would really appreciate a link. this thing is a lot less intuitive than i hoped >.>

What you‘re looking for is an envelope follower. MN maths or function are prime candidates and they are both just generally useful modules to have. If you look for envelope follower on modulargrid, you‘ll find a bunch more.
I‘m not sure about the dynamix doing that and the SMR has followers for every band iirc, but I don‘t think they‘d be my first choice if all I wanted was to extract cv from audio.

3 Likes

I second @dubiousphil on Maths—a good place to start. If you’re planning to work extensively with audio streams you want to extract amplitude envelopes from, you might be able to justify a dedicated module that is either easier to dial in, or offers interesting conveniences. For example, the ADDAC 401 offers not only a VU meter, but handy controls for offsetting and adjusting the extracted CV, plus eight individual gate outputs for each stage of the VU meter. Pretty nifty. The new Percussion Interface from 4ms and Detect-Rx from Steady State Fate are other notable, recent products. If you’re working with the microphones or line level instruments, various “instrument interface” modules, such as the Befaco Instrument Interface v2, have built-in envelope followers, too.

2 Likes

Hi!
A few questions for those who make one-take songs on modular. How many voices/instruments do you have in your system? Do you use external effects?
Do you have an eurorack mixer module? And an eurorack send/return module? Which ones? Or do you use an external mixer?
Cheers,

I usually have between 3-5 voices, which are some variation of two mangroves, a brenso and a morphagene plus sometimes pinged filters. Anything else I need usually comes from my ER-301 but most often it covers any drums I throw in. I don’t use any external effects, everything runs through either the erbe-verb, a spring tank, the mimeophon or something inside the 301.

My mixing section is very minimal, a small doepfer A-138s running into the aux ins on a befaco stmix. That goes straight into my interface, although if I want to post-process a single voice I will run that into a separate input. I did recently buy an external 8x8 matrix mixer but I’m still in the process of integrating that.

Here’s the setup (I’m currently waiting on the flux in the lower right hand corner):

5 Likes

Nice setup, mate! Very powerful!

2 Likes