i’m not totally convinced this is right… hang on one sec…
… yeah ok. @freqout @scanner_darkly so again i don’t have euro stuff and this is just theorycrafting. so take w/ grain of salt. (*) but i don’t see how the arbitrary scaling factor can work consistently for all settings of clock mul and duration.
the scaled gate duration is the red surface. the clock duration is the blue plane. when the surface is above the plane, we got “note tie.” the scaling factor changes the steepness of the surface, but i don’t see how it can prevent them from crossing at some point.
(i’m assuming gate duration multiplier is ==1 btw.)
matlab:
n = 100;
c = linspace(50, 1000, n); % clock duration un ticks
a = 380; % clock scaling factor
d = linspace(50, 1000, n); % duration
g = zeros(n, n); % scaled gate duration
for i=1:n
for j=1:n
g(i,j) = c(i) / a * d(j);
end
end
surf(c, d, g, 'FaceColor','r', 'FaceAlpha',0.4, 'EdgeColor','r', 'EdgeAlpha', 0.7)
dplane = zeros(n, n);
for i=1:n
dplane(i,:) = d;
end
hold on;
surf(c, d, dplane, 'FaceColor','b', 'FaceAlpha',0.4, 'EdgeColor','b', 'EdgeAlpha', 0.7)
hold off;
xlabel('clock duration')
ylabel('step duration')
zlabel('scaled gate duration')
i guess i would implement “note tie” feature differently, with brute force. when user sets gate duration to max, just don’t set the gate-off timer.
(*) i am also frankly kind of slow and hungover today, and could be easily be making some very stupid error or assumption. like about how stage durations even work.
