Cool. All good!

I just wanted to make the point that while enjoyment in the process is paramount it is sometimes the things that are hard and that we struggle with that are the most rewarding in the end. There’s therefore value in including that struggle as part of the process imho.

2 Likes

That’s absolutely correct!

1 Like

I find much that resonates on both sides of the debate. But for me it’s about more than ‘enjoyment vs.’ hard work’.

First, making music is a necessity and I’m not sure ‘enjoyment’ captures that. Even the flow state isn’t simply characterized by enjoyment, and is far less an empty ‘psychological’ abstraction – for me it has always a specific content and thus presents itself as a moment of truth, which is the ground of the necessity. The compulsion to be in the truth. Making music opens the way. Even in this truth I’m not sure I experience enjoyment exactly, at its best it’s a feeling of coming home, a temporary relief from an everyday dysphoric consciousness in which I’m cut off from this ‘home’ – but there are definitely things to confront there, even horror in some parts.

Second – the process of releasing music is hence one of exposing this truth to others. This suggests difficulties beyond that of simply putting in the time, working hard, developing and exercising business skills. It’s facing the raw pain of exposure. Especially when one knows what has been said. So this is a pain that cannot be quantified in terms of time spent or other indicators of ‘hard work’.

And there is pain on either side of the dilemma – do I present this just as it is, as many artists (but not myself) are privileged to do, or do I conceal its origin (as was the path of someone else I know from ‘the community’). There is pain thus either in a direct or oblique expression. And then there is the question of reward. Reward is perhaps getting to tell my own story instead of letting all the tabloids do it for me – which in turn may help others tell their own stories. But I am not deluded as to the significance of my powers. Quite likely, one person’s voice is simply lost and otherwise well-meaning listeners will simply project the tabloid frameworks back onto my work, which not only hurts me, it can also hurt others. The second approach, to work covertly, also seems to have few rewards. In the example I indicated, the concealed origin means that the work is simply absorbed into other things. So this music is ‘enjoyed’, but it’s unclear how much this oblique approach helps others live openly in their own truth, especially when there isn’t even an esoteric path with symbols which communicate internally. Such ‘passing’ (for that’s what this is) can then resemble not releasing anything in the first place.

So right now – absent ‘strength in numbers’ that would help mitigate the pain of exposure, and also absent willingness to ‘pass’, I settle for making the music but not sharing it. And I don’t think learning business skills or putting in more work resolves any of the problems.

8 Likes

ah the treacherous dual axes of audio and moral fidelity :slight_smile:

5 Likes

Cross-post, I’ve found that importing mp3’s as raw data into Audacity, and then exporting again, generates some artifacts which might be appealing to some.

Clean:

Glitched:

3 Likes

Great Idea!
Unfortunately I could not reproduce your results, I just got different flavors of pure noise. Which import settings did you choose after selecting raw data? How was your mp3 encoded?

I am planning to write a better guide, but for now:

  1. mp3 has just been encoded with LAME encoder.
  2. import as raw data -> ULAW
  3. export as raw data -> ULAW
  4. change the filename extension of the exported “.raw” to “.mp3”

edit: I’m yet to see if doing things between step 2 and 3 will doing anything usable, but will find out soon.

1 Like

Yes that works:
Before

After

Playing with import sample rate results in different glitches

2 Likes

I really like the sound that people like Amulets or Jogging House, Hainbach, R Beny a lot of ambient instagram artists get from cassettes/microcassettes/reel to reels/dictaphones and would like to figure out how to accomplish that soft sort of almost filtered quality they get. I assume its something to do with compression and saturation, but i find it hard to achieve with my little handheld voice recorder due to the incoming signal being too harsh and my portastudio seems to barely add anything. I’m sure it’s subtle, but does anyone have any tips or ideas on how you would get a nice soft texture similar to this example i found here, starting at 6:21 (even if it isn’t accomplished with tape):

i also like the contact mic sound here with the stones. the description says its being fed through a morphagene, and i can see how maybe some of the peripheral noise from the contact mic maybe got blended in. im not sure exactly how splice morphing works, since i don’t have a morphagene, but i still imagine there is something more to getting that really nice muffled tape-like sound. do i need a reel to reel to achieve this? or a morphagene? i work a lot with field recordings, so my sound sources would be similar to both of these examples:

1 Like

I’m guessing but the sound at 6.21 sounds like gargling water with a contact mic held to the throat that was recorderd to tape and the buzzy sound comes from a distortion when the input levels get high.

1 Like

yeah i think its a field recording but im wondering what the processing is there. you think that low pass filtered type smoothed out sound is just from tape?

This is my recording with just contact mic and tape. Does the first 20 seconds or so capture the LPF sound you mean ? Like a distant space ?

1 Like

its kind of similar, but not quite the effect im looking for. there are still some harsh transients and higher frequencies in yours. it sounds more like the results i get when i use tape. there must be some other sort of processing or pedal on it. or maybe a certain kind of tape player/tape. the very muffled sound, specifically between 6.21-6.23 is what im talking about. i was thinking maybe the Fairfield Shallow Water kind of does this, and in that instance it would be an lpf i think

you hear what i mean though? its the same effect as the stones via contact mic in the video below. it almost sounds like the real soft vinyl crackles that The Caretaker achieves in his albums.maybe its more vinyl than tape. its not a warbly flanger thing, im pretty sure. its whatever else happens with those kinds of formats in certain instances

I think a lot of that sound comes from playing things at half speed from tape

1 Like

This would make sense as some of the fidelity of tape comes from the playback speed.
So lowering the playback lowers the pitch but also lowers the clarity.
This may cause a subtle muffling of the sound.

1 Like

It also changes the transients a lot, which I think are pretty fundametal for the perception of sound

4 Likes

Which AirWindows plugs do you especially like and why?
I have the whole bundle, but it can be hard to get a handle on them because there’s so many
with such similar names.

This sounds very interesting, do you have any recordings somewhere in which you used 520DX?

Hi, I was recently given the tip to look up this video with Christian Henson. I suppose many are familiar with him, for me it’s a new aquaintance. I believe he is involved with Spitfire Audio, right? I thought it was a pretty interesting discussion of sounds and waveforms in general and why different lofi-approaches such as tape can make sounds more interesting and richer. I haven’t yet had time to check out more of his videos, but I definitely will.

The film is titled “Why are synths so difficult to mix?”

7 Likes

Having seen the love for the DigDugDiy Purple Rain - lofi comp/bitcrusher - I got an impulse some month ago and bought one. With all the import taxes/customs etc this little bare pcb still cost me a bit more than I’d like to remember. :thinking: But hey - first test yesterday was great fun! I really need to make this a centerpiece of “a small project”. Only mono though, but if it worked for Mr Spector. :sunglasses:

(PS. If anyone is interested, make sure to follow DigDugDiy on social media to get a heads up when there’s a new batch. The Etsy shop seem to sell out as soon as they are announced. No affiliation.)

2 Likes