#433

Even comes with cables! Nice.

#434

IMG_6358.JPG2591×1727 1.83 MB

I’ve had this for years, not sure why I never posted it. It’s not fantastic, but it’s very useful right now.

3 Likes
#435

Just bagged two of these and i’m super happy with them :slight_smile:

amazing for taking a few pieces out the studio to get headspace elsewhere

s

#436

and you can use it as a radio!

komabox.jpg2370×1194 1.82 MB

43 Likes
#437

some of my sessions with the koma mixer lately have turned into me listening an interesting radio show instead of doing whatever i intended to do :smiley:

12 Likes
#438

nice layout and design, built-in 50w stereo amp and 
wait for it
 reverb!

12 Likes
#439

So, is someone going to make these? :smile:

1 Like
#440

I made a prototype! Will post about it soon.

IMG_20170620_163723_1.jpg2862×2146 1.81 MB

28 Likes
#441

FANTASTIC!

I had a feeling / was hoping


very cool!

#442

10/10 would buy for at least 20 characters.

1 Like
#443

I love this idea, but since most modules don’t have an output level control this would need to be paired with at least a 4-6 channel attenuator. If this could be double the width, but with level pots for each channel I would be buying a couple of them for sure :slight_smile:

#444

I disagree.

I like the simplicity of it, and chances are you wouldn’t be using all the inputs at any one time and most of us probably have a 3-attenuator module or similar in our racks anyway.

#445

That’s possible. I only have two attenuators in my rack because of the way my current mixing setup works
 And module outputs are all over the map in terms of level, so some sort of attenuation on these channels would be essential for getting a balance.

Something like this could be the perfect companion:

2-3 of those would work perfectly with this mixer concept.

I take it back, don’t build it in, this is more modular in spirit :slight_smile:

#446

I use the discontinued Pittsburgh MixMult: http://pittsburghmodular.com/mix-mult/

For this new module which @billyhologram is DEFINITELY MAKING FOR ALL OF US I’d suggest the AT AT AT from thonk: https://www.modulargrid.net/e/thonk-at-at-at

#447

I like that concept pretty much as-is.

Maybe a good compromise is to allow the gain to be set with trim pots on the back or a jumper gang. Might be easy enough for a savvy user to swap out resistor values in summing to achieve the same thing.

#448

I will say it again: this is a perfect idea for a MINIMAL MIXER concept exactly how you designed it.

4 Likes
#449

I guess, the more I think about it, I wonder if the two output jacks shouldn’t be placed on the two opposite ends of the module. That way it becomes visually even more apparent where you place the input signal in relation to the output pan spectrum


Just a thought.

5 Likes
#450

Just one more thought along the conversations of the output jacks (if you are open for input - its otherwise fine, as-is)
 I think everyone has “just one thing” that would make it even more ideal for them - myself included. My one thing would be a volume control in place of one of the output jacks and the remaining jack would be stereo so that a pair of headphones could be used. Its easy enough for me to use an adapter to separate the signals if going to an outboard interface or mixer. In fact, I’d most likely need to use a 1/4" adapter for that purpose anyway. Making the module compatible with headphones would make this thing a must have for small, portable rigs. Of course, I would take the small <4hp form factor over additional bells and whistles any day.

Either way, well done :slight_smile: and I will most likely want one even in its current iteration.

#451

I vote for exactly as it is. It’s perfect.

3 Likes
#452

Like, and likely to buy one!