Well, to follow @ht73’s patch description to a T definitely will require some case-by-case thinking (or rack-by-rack, as it were), so let me instead translate their words into a patch schematic and leave the rest to you.
So. Let’s call our filter, delay line, what-have-you module and let’s work “backwards”. Mult the output of module twice (Stackcable? Mult module? you decide). Listen to one copy and patch another through a VCA (or LPG). Now, we need a negative-going envelope added to a positive offset so that if the envelope is at zero, the VCA will be open to taste. If your VCA has a bias control, we’re already halfway there. If not, you’ll need to do some mixing. So, let’s create an envelope from our final copy of the output. One way to do this is via Cold Mac, mentioned below, another (potentially), would be to use Maths as I mentioned above. Somewhere along the way, though, we need to invert the envelope and add the offset. Then we patch the envelope we ended up with to the CV control of the VCA. Likely we’ll want to add some attenuation to taste. In the end, we want to mix the output of the VCA with the input of module.
As far as Cold Mac, the main observation is surface-level: patching a signal into slope turns follow into an envelope follower; in this configuration I’m basically ignoring the rest of the module.
If we wanted to be annoyingly clever (and hey, finding annoyingly clever uses for Mannequins modules is something of a pastime for me) and weren’t inputting audio to anywhere else in Cold Mac, we actually could save ourselves one mult: the mac output of Cold Mac mixes all the (audio-rate) inputs and attenuates them according to the value of survey. In fewer words, mac is a 6-to-1 AC-coupled mixing VCA with survey as its CV control and the knob as a bias. So, we could just patch our inverted and attenuated envelope into survey (no need to worry about offset) and our mac would be what we would mix with the input to module.