I believe it would also be useful/musical if it could optionally gradually slide back to the recalled level rather than snapping right to it. The slide speed/slew and maybe even its curve should be adjustable?
I feel like the soft clipping aspect of Phyllis could bring a little more “vibe” to resampling but I don’t know if I’ve compared them enough to have a strong personal preference.
edit: @kbit, it just dawned on me. You can do this already! Load up phyllis, and use tape to record your sample. Then load the sample into sam for cutting.
For sure! I thought it might be useful to combine so one could cut out making an extra sample on the internal storage, and how the filter could help with “producing” right on Norns a bit tighter; like a Roland sampler-esque work flow.
Not to be a snowflake, but @justmat could I ask you to change the name of this script? That particular name has annoyingly bad memories for me, which I’d prefer not to see in my norniverse.
How about ladder, though I’m not sure if the underlying ugen is actually modelling a Moog-ish ladder filter?
Sorry to be a pain, but, you know, people n words n stuff. Maybe we need some simple guidelines for script names?
The name isn’t important to me. I chose phyllis because it fulfills a silly naming convention I’ve been enjoying. “sam the sampler”, “phyllis the filter”, “vinny the verb” etc… I’m sure there are a million names that I could use.
That said, how can I be sure that someone doesn’t have a history with… say, Otis? (otis was the name of a beloved childhood pet, but it was also my grandfathers name. he was an abusive alcoholic.) Should I refrain from using names altogether? Or can there be more than one otis?