Thanks! This is super helpful and inspiring to hear your workflow! Tagging @Xylr as well who was interested in sequencing from norns

2 Likes

I don’t know serum, but I definitely agree that it’s more a set of building blocks than a “sounds” with that said, I found it much more usable to make string, and Wavestation type evolving sounds rather than Organ sounds, for example. For those sorts of sounds, something like the prophet 12 is a bit better.

The thing about the hydrsynth is that you can run audio rate signals into the CV inputs, so there’s a lot more flexibility than might initially appear.

Also, I found the CC implementation to be quite good, unlike the digitone which will choke if you start modulating a bunch of parameters in real time.

2 Likes

that actually makes me want this thing even more. i also would really like to just have very basic building blocks to make my own things. one thing i dislike about the digitone sometimes is that it does have a distinct sound and can be hard at times to get a pure sine sound. it’s impossible in my experience to make piano sounds though, which according to mangrove’s comment may be the same with the hydrasynth. i might have to try one out. if it has enough flexibility to really morph those fundamental building block sounds, it seems like potentially what i’ve been looking for. i will say, now that I understand the Analog Four better, i don’t think I will be in the market for another synth anytime soon. It has really surprised me in the best way. Thank you for the breakdown. Sounds awesome and not really what i thought it was

Sequential Prophet 6 and OB-6 just got an OS beta update with MPE support and Prophet 5 like “vintage knob”.

9 Likes

MPE adds sooooo much to these imo. It feels like new life in my ob6.

2 Likes

This is so exciting. Will load the beta on my OB-6, might hold off on my Prophet 12 for now, just because I have more patches dependent on the old firmware. Thank you so much for sharing!

I can’t afford it but MPE on the OB-6 gives me an itch to make something like “John Carpenter via Vangelis”. I’ll have to stick to OB-Xd for now.

1 Like

damn, this is a really nice surprise. wasn’t ever expecting an update to the p6, especially not one that sounds so good :drooling_face:

5 Likes

And a video of MPE support (Linnstrument + OB6)

4 Likes

Funny enough, the updates to the P6/OB-6 have encouraged me to take advantage of the low prices on the massively underrated Prophet 12 and I’ve got one of those (in keyboard form) on the way now. Whether my Rev2 stays or goes will depend on whether I want to replace it with a more vintage synth in light of the P12’s capabilities or if I feel it does a good enough job filling in the gaps. I’m not terribly nostalgic for the extremely detuned sounds (frankly I sort of hated the slop knob’s default algorithms on the Rev2), but if they brought this subtler, more nuanced vintage mode to it, that might retain it firmly in the keeper position as it would free up the mod slots and gated sequencer positions I use for VCM.

I couldn’t personally care less about MPE, but I’m very glad to see Sequential continue to improve even their older gear. Certainly gives the P6 a new lease on life. J3PO’s great comparison vid shows some of the areas that the P6 really shines and this vintage knob update closes the gap further. If I were willing to spend that kind of money on a low-voice-count poly (I’m not, at least yet), the choice just got narrowed to “nostalgia” versus “features”.

1 Like

Using this for creating weird complex timbre and love it very much

7 Likes

dream synth. are you posting your explorations anywhere? ig or something maybe? i’d love to see how people are using this one

1 Like

Yeah the Iridium is amazing! Kernel mode is bonkers. It could have just that mode alone and be a fantastic synth. Also, I think Waldorf really should emphasize the fact that the digital former effects are per voice, which is a great sound design tool – reading the manual it isn’t clear that this is the case.

2 Likes

Very soon I just had it this week

1 Like

Funny, i thought that it was very easy to configure and make patches without the software. I supposed the build aspect definitively influence more how one use and “feel” a synth rather than the synth engine itself. :slight_smile:

1 Like

Off topic of poly synths, but the battery comment reminded me that I have an ancient SansAmp fuzz box that turns into an insane alien life form when the battery gets too low… I need to try my synth through it! Talk about unpredictable :clown_face:

3 Likes

Recently had the Juno-66 mod kit installed in my Juno-60 and I really like it. I made a video going over some of the features and then wrote a Max patch to control it all in a bit more streamlined fasion.

6 Likes

Any Clavia Nord Lead/Rack enthusiast here?

I personally have the Rack2x which I love since day one, it’s been my first synthesizer I bought with my first paycheck years ago. A synth which can be used for a lot of purposes, it’s very expressive, it sounds amazing, it’s simple, 4 parts multitimbral and so much versatile, maybe not the fattest soundIng oscillators (multi timbral can helps!), but it’s super punchy (thx Clavia envelopes) and
the FM sounds wonderful,

The “Morph” parameter is amazing, easily achievable modular style patches, you can basically modulate every single parameter of the panel via midi velocity and/or mod wheel and you can set an offset/range for the modulation destination simply pressing the “morph” button while you turn the parameter knob you want to modulate.
I love to “patch” the velocity of my midi controller pads to the envelopes and to the arpeggiator clock, hitting the pads with 3 different velocities (very slow/medium/strong) to create asynchronous random FM percussion/bongo sequences/rhythms.
You would say it’s a modular synth sound if you’re not in front it listening…

It is a drum synth as well! (at least the Lead/Rack2x)
It has a “special mode” where you can create 8 sounds within one preset.
Basically the AFX mode you can find on the Bass Station2 by Novation…

Another wonderful and expressive sound the Clavia Nord Rack 2x can do easily is “tape warble“ emulation: gently modulating osc1 via osc2 as heavy filtered noise (the osc2 coarse freq become filter/clour for the osc2 when in noise mode)

It’s an inspiring polysynth… I’d love to know if someone else feel it as I am :slight_smile:

3 Likes

Absolutely. I got the first NL when it came out in 1995. When I saw it I just knew I had to have it and traded in a lot of stuff for it. Since then I upgraded through both the 2 and 2X models and now have the NL4. It doesn’t have the percussion mode but you can kind of achieve the same thing with impulse morphs.

There’s another interesting trick on the 2/2X that you didn’t mention: you can decouple the amp and filter envelopes and trigger them from different midi channels. This brings you even further into modular land. :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

Yes, I know, you’re totally right!

I should have mention it, but I’ve already wrote too much ahah…
If I remember well, NL2 (which probably sounds richer/rougher than the 2X, due to different converters/amp??) had even a “trick” to achieve a strange behavior right? Something like powering the synth on while pressing some buttons, in order to let the synth sounds very weird and unpredictable, do you remember it??

How do you like the 4? I’m really curious, It’s the only one that never never tried, the last one I touched was the A1, it’s nice, but I prefer NL2X actually…