Not something I’d like to see as a societal edict, but just part of my own personal view.
I heard a talk about michel foucault’s work. Apparently he held the view that the labeling of people based on their sexual preference, or gender related identity, was actualy a way for the ruling class to be better able to supress the minority.
Someone subscribing to this perspective might say, that the differentiation between the smaller cultural group and the mainstream, is the leverage the greater group has to marginalize them further. Now this is not the only factor. Men and women are about 50/50 in number yet there still are power struggles.
But imagine if being of african descent was not visible from the outside it might be harder to discriminate. We all know non-western names for example are a disadvantage in getting a job.
So if the modern gender pronouns become part of your name, essentialy as in leftist circles and sometimes in greater society we’re starting to see happen. Somewhat what you’re proposing here. Are we really sure it will lead to less hurt feelings?
If being gay for example, like foucault was, was not a category. No one would be able to hurt you with a lable. Even a ‘side-eyed’ calling of the preferred pronoun still is no fun, I imagine.
The people who act intolerantly towards ‘the other’ will not change and still be disrespectful, with their attitude. Or maybe the plusses will outweigh the minuses, you can’t say.
I personaly think the overt labeling has negative influences as well, towards the same goal of being kind to people, and improving society.
I would prefer personaly, that we just asume that everyone is equal in the first place. So far with the people I’ve met who had ‘different’ pronouns, a simple conversation when introducing ourselves worked great.
A fun aspect of a somewhat more oldschool internet board/forum, nice and modern as this one is, is that everyone is more equal as well, because you can’t immediately identify parts of their person. Kind of the same way school uniforms are supposed to work.
So I would prefer that, but I do think it’s good to think about terms like ‘guys’ adressing a group of people, who are not all guys.