That looks fantastic… great work :+1:!

Having the voice banks in ascending range of pitch would be cool (and follows how the real Lyra works).

I can easily add a scale function so don’t add that to the list.

The one thing I would say; having independent hold controls could limit the potential for using an important (IMO) real Lyra technique; using hold to play cluster of voices, or even chords if you can get it tuned (no small feat :joy:).

1 Like

Looks very cool! I already included a bunch of sounds from your ensemble in a track. Very much on board with the “not a keyboard” thing, although it could be great to have that option but I’m not sure. So far so good from where I stand, it seems great and weird in the way I’d expect the hardware to be.

1 Like

Off he goes. Feels like just yesterday I was getting started, now it’s time to pat him on the bottom and send him off to be horribly maligned by the internet. Circle of life.

Note that if you played with the beta (which I’m taking down now), the snapshots will need to be re-saved. I changed the switches for Fast/Slow to a toggle.

https://www.native-instruments.com/en/reaktor-community/reaktor-user-library/entry/show/13457/

14 Likes

Brilliant! Will be grabbing it this evening - fantastic work!

Also: it looks great!

2 Likes

I agree the final version looks stunning, amazing work @hermbot I’m super impressed by how quickly you put this together.

1 Like

I think I figured out part of this. There’s kind of a dead spot in the output when the Sharp control is at 10-11 o’clock. This is due to the way I was mixing and filtering the oscillators. I just tested a different configuration and found a more consistent volume when going from triangle to sawtooth. (At the expense of a tad more CPU, but this ensemble is pretty light to begin with.) This will be one of the first updates I push.

1 Like

I got an idea for synthesizer with particular interconnected controls, bunch of sine waves and bandpass filters, and so on. Inspired by Lyra-8, Meng Qi Wing Pinger and such. So finally I took a delve into Reaktor proper, and started my first own ensemble outside Blocks interface. I’m only at primary level of course, but it’s surprisingly straightforward so far. Reading some of the documentation and looking around in the software even Core doesn’t look that intimidating. I really should have gotten into this earlier, but I guess a good idea for a project goes a long way when it comes to learning stuff.

4 Likes

Something I’ve been tinkering with is shaping the oscillator output. I wanted to try and add more analog “ripple” that you’d see from a real synth to the stock Primary oscillator.

Basically it’s a comparator that triggers a very short envelope, which is connected to an oscillator running at twice the pitch of the first oscillator.

image

That yields this:

The difference is subtle, and perhaps not worth the overhead. Still, something to toy with.

3 Likes

It’s a really great ecosystem to build up a synth. For some reason I gel with it better than Max/MSP.

Primary can be a bit intimidating. At first glance there is not much difference, but there’s a lot under the hood. I’m just starting to delve deeper into it.


I just found out today that there is a bulit-in virtual keyboard in Reaktor. :man_facepalming: This would have been so handy for all the time I spent working on ensembles on my laptop and away from my desktop / MIDI controller. I use Reaper which also has a similar feature, but building in the standalone Reaktor application is so much better.

It turns your computer keyboard from Z to M into a two octave input.

image

1 Like

NI has one of these software managers you have to install. This usually stops me from getting software. How irritating is this one?

I don’t find it intrusive at all.

5 Likes

Regarding the mess that NI softwares can be / have been, I find it’s very relaxing to have the NI access thing now. It’s rare that a company have such a bloated ecosystem that these softs are useful but for NI it definitely is. It’s not perfect but it’s simple enough that I never think about it.

6 Likes

I agree. I would be annoyed if I only had Reaktor or any other single plugin and nothing else, but as Komplete 12 owner I’m for once glad for the hub. It doesn’t bother me, works well, generally doesn’t suddenly forget my login info etc. which I can’t say about all the other software hubs. For managing a lot of plugins it’s ace, and with Slate Everything Bundle I actually wish it had a central installation/manager program.

2 Likes

I’ve personally taken a hard line against any manager software or hardware licensing (I’m looking at you, ilok), but NI is the one exception. And I have to say, theirs is pretty darn good. Makes updating and installing a snap. No issues with it at all.

2 Likes

I finally had the time and energy to finish up the synth I mentioned earlier, 4 voice drone synth, and make a little Youtube demo too. Super happy with how this turned out and I’ve already used it on couple of tracks I’m working on. First entry on User Library.

Link to User Library: https://www.native-instruments.com/en/reaktor-community/reaktor-user-library/entry/show/13511/
Youtube: https://youtu.be/C6YSeDEonvE

2 Likes

Well, to take it a little further I must say that I only use one Native Instrument product (Reaktor), and I’ve never been annoyed by Native Access.

(edit) …Or maybe two products to be honest, as I use both Reaktor 5 and Reaktor 6 !
:sweat_smile:

1 Like

Love the sound of this (albeit on my phone speaker).

Definitely going to have a play once the sun has gone down sufficiently to justify me sitting inside on my laptop :grin:)

1 Like

Is there something that 5 does that 6 can’t? I also have both, but never thought to keep using 5 after I got 6…

I think I’ve you’ve already got DAW projects that use 5, there’s no easy way to replace instances with 6 ( I could well be wrong though).

1 Like

This is part of the answer.

Also, almost every single day I use two computers (for various reasons) to work on the same Ableton Live 9 Projects that include many Reaktor instances.
The Projects are shared between the two computers using DropBox.

When loading a Project that was last opened on the other computer, I have to locate the Reaktor Ensembles that were previously saved with the Project, as proposed by the following window.

Picture 1

With Reaktor 5, I have to show the path only once for all Ensembles, thanks to this second window.

Picture 2

Unfortunately, the second window does not appear when using Reaktor 6.

This means that I would have to locate between 20 and 40 Ensembles separately (depending on the Project) each time I open a Project that was last opened on the other computer (several times a day).

One day, I read the user manual and searched the forums for a solution to this problem, without success.
Until today I didn’t ask Native Instruments about it, as I’m fine with Reaktor 5 most of the time (I only use Reaktor 6 to see how builders have implemented such and such function, to find inspiration or a solution to a specific problem).

And, honestly, I’d prefer to continue using Reaktor 5 as long as possible.
I’m comfortable with the interface and do not need the extra features offered by Reaktor 6.

Anyway, if anyone has a trick for showing the path only once when using multiple instances of Reaktor 6 in Live 9, I’d be happy to know, as it would be useful to me from time to time when I reverse engineer a Reaktor 6 Ensemble.
It’s quite possible that there is an extremely simple solution that I completely overlooked !
:slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like