Resources for music composition & theory

This is a pretty sensitive topic for me, because I studied classical/20th century composition for my undergrad, had to “unlearn” a bunch of stuff that didn’t work for me, and then earned an MFA in electronic music from a very non-traditional program that actually made me a better musician, as opposed to simply being a better “thinker about music.” (Not to talk down about other programs, I am just sharing my experience.)

I would only learn a traditional instrument if it makes sounds you want to make. If you like music with chords, learn about them, their traditional and non-traditional relationships, how tonality works, and what is usually referred to as “common practice.” Get a keyboard, or a guitar, or learn to read/write music and use software. I would also encourage you to look at “species counterpoint” if you want to understand how Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, etc. learned to build music based on vertical harmonies, and how equal temperament tuning influenced tonal music. I’m happy to help answer any questions you might have about these things, and there are probably others on this board who are well-versed in it.

That being said, you could become a great composer without studying common practice theory at all. I completely agree with what Jason said.

If we take a John Cage-ish perspective, music is essentially sound organized with intention. He used chance processes to attempt to remove his human inclinations and habits from the process of composing, and observing the results afterward. This is one approach to composition that is really easy with computers, and is a completely valid way of composing music that has little if nothing to do with common practice theory — aside from the moments when the chance procedures form relationships similar to familiar musical relationships.
Pauline Oliveros made a lot of tonal music, but she also composed a lot of pieces with no notes — scores based entirely on text directions, intuition, and the interactions between performers who compose collectively and in the moment.

Ultimately, I find composition to be about building relationships between sounds. What does this sound do when it’s placed after that sound? Before that other sound? What happens if I play this sound while slowly turning up the reverb? Do I hear that “movement” of sound leading to another place? If so, how do I facilitate that process? What is the relationship between loud and soft? Fast and slow? Etc. etc. Play around, and have confidence in the things you like. If you aren’t sure, record it and listen to it in a week. You’ll have different ears and you’ll learn from it.

That’s how my compositional process works. Play around, find things I like, and see how they relate to each other. And don’t be afraid to share! Hopefully that wasn’t too pedantic/pretentious.


The above advice is spot on and I definitely think learning an instrument, probably keys (I’m a guitar/bass player originally), is the best way to understand what tonal relationships, harmonies and arrangements work for you and you are then able to go and find resources that help you understand what it is that you’re into. and i would emphasise what @jasonw22 has said about theory being a description of something that is otherwise separate and not some kind of law that dictates the music. Having said that, I find this series of you tube vids extremely informative but informal and fun and I think are accessible to all levels of music theory understanding. The examples used are easy to relate to too. I too have no formal training and only put effort into learning theory in the last few years after around 20 years of just playing - wish I had done it earlier though. Enjoy the journey!!


My father studied jazz music for years - he knew more about composition and harmony and how arrangements work than I ever will. He also took guitar lessons for years. But he could never put the two of them together. He’d ask me how I did it, and my answer was “it’s called playing piano for a reason”.

You’ve gotten very good advice here that I will neither amplify or diminish, @guillaume but I hope that as you bring your (obviously substantial) cognitive capabilities to the task of learning how to compose, don’t forget it’s play, even when it has structure and goals. Have fun with your bloops and bleeps because they’re your bloops and bleeps.


That Ableton Making Music book may well be worth your time.

1 Like

Building on my more conceptual response in the recent “path to improvement” thread, I hit a similar wall this year. Working through the same feelings, I realized that the big jump for me was to go from creating some pleasant/interesting complementary sounds to building them out into…something. The keywords here are creating a feeling or a narrative arc and, what usually gets you there, form and arrangement. If your sounds are your vocabulary, you have to put them in an interesting order and combination to tell your story (arrangement).

Side note, I know ambient and experimental music has, perhaps, less formal structure, but I do still think it hinges on building a feeling and does include subtle form-based elements.

Here are some further resources that may be of use. Mileage may vary depending on the type of music you are trying to make, but I think there are helpful nuggets throughout. Loving these discussions by the way, thanks!

Ignore the word dubstep :wink:

Good primer.

The next two are teasers, but they present a nice digestible outline of a classical perspective, which would be easy to build some research upon. I also like the idea of applying simple formal elements like ABA or AABA or what have you to electronic “new music” compositions.
Yes it’s a mall guy with a guitar over his shoulder, but I think there are some good concepts here!

This is Kate & Ray Harmony’s youtube channel. I don’t love his music but he’s got his theory down and knows how to teach quick ‘tricks’ that can be applied to the electronic/digital composition. EG “don’t go up by incremental fifths in your bassline”

This is an old grainy video of Four Tet in the studio. Nice over the shoulder glimpse at an arrangement and composition in the DAW. In my opinion you can’t go wrong with anything Four Tet!

Finally, if you are into podcasts or learn by listening, I’d dig through the archives of the Composer Quest podcast. Lots of different perspectives here!

Bonus: for quick melodic and harmonic inspiration, and just a cool ass music tool in general, I’m still in love with the recent Teropa implementation of Laurie Spiegel’s music mouse. Can’t share this one enough.


Thanks for the shoutout, Jason. You guys should check out the aQWERTYon, a web app that I helped develop with the NYU Music Experience Design Lab:

It maps chords and scales to your QWERTY keyboard in an intuitive and musically expressive way, and acts like a standard MIDI controller for use with any DAW. It goes beyond the basic diatonic scales to include more fun and exotic scales as well. We’re going to be adding some music theory visualization components in the coming months as well - for example, we’re going to be tying this in:

I’ll echo the other people here in saying that theory flows from music, rather than the other way around. Too many music theory resources present their concepts as if they’re rule systems, rather than attempts to formally describe things that people in a particular cultural context have found to sound good. In particular, be suspicious of classical theory–the notions of what sounded correct in eighteenth century Austria are quite different from what might sound good to you. Jazz theory texts are more likely to be helpful.


I agree very much with all of this. (And have had to go through a similar unlearning experience after music school…)

Listen to a lot of music. Critical listening to the acoustic field of whatever space you’re in is also a nice way to exercise your ear and it can be done anywhere, anyplace.

Then, make a lot things and become comfortable with moving on, letting go, and making more things.

Listen listen, make make!


+1 to moving on and making more! A very important thing to develop is non-attachment, and not identifying with the things we make (seeing them as a reflection of who we are). I like about 10% of my sketches, and some small percentage of that is stuff I actually use. Some sketches aren’t ready for the big time, and many of them, while rooted in good/interesting ideas, just aren’t up to snuff. This is where having fun comes in, because it keeps me creating even when I don’t get the results I want.


I cant speak very well to composition, it is something i am also working on after about 18 months of this production adventure. Which is why my thoughts should be taken with a grain of salt.

I dont want to contradict others with much more experience, knowledge and skill, but as an alternative to finding what will work best for you: I am not convinced that learning a specific instrument other than the ones you are using is entirely necessary. Picking up a guitar or piano and going through that learning curve might not help a whole lot with the modular. Learning music theory is a totally different mode of thinking than the creative making mode. It can be really difficult to apply new, shaky knowledge of theory to the inspired, intuitive, flow state that i seem to be the most productive in.

Not that theory is bad, as most people seem to agree that it has helped them and they were glad to learn it, but you might not need a whole lot to help impose a helpful framework. I took some piano lessons and really tried to learn scales. Improvising with a couple that i am comfortable using have really helped things to sound more coherent and premeditated rather than randomly hitting keys. (try Cminor or Bmajor, they sound interesting and fit the hand better than most)

Practicing scales and learning chords etc has been rewarding as a concrete formulaic way of improving my technical skills. It is a tangible way of seeing progress as you become familiar, faster and more confident. Practice can be a good way to feel productive, to be engaging musically even when you dont feel particularly inspired. In this way it can be a gateway as sitting down to practice can lead to unexpected and interesting tangents as you discover little things that sound neat together.

While learning some limited amount of theory and traditional instrument technique has helped, it hasnt been as helpful as exploring ideas on approach, or technical aspects of Ableton, or a particular synth. And more importantly as @letteronsounds put it

So you should definitely just keep making bleeps and bloops. But you should also record them, even if you don’t think it is very good. Eventually you will have an accumulation of little voyages that you can puzzle together and make into compositions.

I stumbled across a recent interview:

One thing that stood out was that they all agreed that thinking or overthinking is bad. Paraphrasing Abayomi ‘I need to play with things, really interact with the sound so im not thinking, im not necessarily trying to get a particular sound’.

I would emphasize what @bobbcorr said about play. Like a child who learns from playing, doing, experimenting, making movements and seeing what happens. I think its important to have fun, that you can take ‘play’ seriously and turn it into ‘work’ as you develop something and continue to practice. Its easier to trust your intuition and the accumulated musical knowledge you have built up by listening when approaching music with a playful, exploratory and inquisitive nature.

I like @healthylives approach of ‘creating a feeling or narrative arc’. Think of how you are moving things along, introducing change and evolving the song. Sometimes i think of a piece as visiting a foreign city and as i walk through i hear the blacksmith shop, then as i pass by this sound i encounter another. They sound different but still remain in the same city or place within the context of the song.

Another shout out to @Ethan_Hein, his writings and approach to music have been inspiring and educational. I’ve had particularly good results studying and reproducing his transcribed rhythm patterns.

Sorry if i was rambling on and not quite addressing your question regarding composition.


Thanks all for your very rich answers. It is beyond what I expected, and it’s going to take me some time to digest it it all, and go through the many resources posted. I am very happy that this thread has turned into a deep conversation around composition and music theory :slight_smile:


this might sound quite mundane (may also have been mentioned) but practicing scales with a metronome just to get some structure in there with anything else you are doing will certainly help some aspect of musicality. any instrument. i think you can’t separate all the musical concepts when it comes to an end piece or performance. it all informs the music brain.


about learning an instrument / practicing scales, i would argue that the usefulness of that depends if you are aiming to compose tonal music or lean towards musique concrète, sonic art, noise, or something that doesn’t abide the traditional ways of music (after all it’s been more than half a century that those pathes are being traced).


+1 for this. I found it a very useful resource.


Here’s a short video about Eliane Radigue. Her comments about process and approaching the creation of sound make sense to me, and her instruments are non-traditional but the process seems very much the same. Make things that interest you, and if you don’t like “cliché” sounds, avoid them until you land on something interesting. Lots of other gems about creative intent, etc.


Learning scales is all about muscle memory, and discipline, and developing a sense of discernment. The more naturally you can instantly connect a musical thought into physical action, bypassing your thinking brain, the more capable you come, and the more natural your music becomes.

So I play scales. A lot of scales.


Great tools! I would like some help if possible…
How can someone use the aqwertyon app as a midi controller?

On Mac, it’s very easy. The aQWERTYon sends MIDI via the IAC bus. If you have it open in a browser tab, any app that listens for the IAC bus will receive MIDI from it immediately. Sometimes you will need to set the IAC bus as a MIDI input in your DAW, and occasionally you will need to open Audio/MIDI Setup to activate it.

On Windows, there is an extra step - you will need to use a program like MIDI Yoke to route MIDI from the web browser to your DAW.

Here is a tutorial video on using the aQWERTYon with Noteflight - the same setup will work with any DAW.

1 Like

Thanks, I will try (Reaper on a Mac)!