Wait, what is the price?

  1. Isn’t it too low? :slight_smile:

The adding of bad synth piccolo to a prog rock track was a pretty strange use case for the module!
but just wanted to join in and say it would be good to have a norns take on this. the changing sample rates on the beat sounded amazing. The TE pocket operator speak does this kind of synthesis ( I think) and thats tiny.

Here’s Panharmonium in feedback through ResEq and d0, Rings drone as the only input.

Has anyone else picked up the PH? It’s incredible in every way*. My biggest wish though would be a single CV output of the tracked centroid for driving external filters, etc.

*except the ways Rossum demonstrated.

6 Likes

Heh. I really question their demo strategy, but I guess it was enough to show some of us the potential of such a thing.

I had one for about a week. It was a busy week at the modular, but I decided it wasn’t for me. I had preordered it back when, and it arrived right after I decided I was going to rework my modular to have a bit more focus.

Where I liked Panharmonium was at a slower clock rate, preferably tempo synced, harmonizing with the input. Something like a fancy shimmer reverb/freeze delay. Outside of that I found it a little hard to work with and to make it fit in with what I want to do.

And I realized that for the freeze/harmonize case I’d probably be better off with Clouds, in terms of timbre and options and easy of use. So I sold it quickly and picked up a Supercell instead. I think that was the right choice for me.

A tracking output would definitely have been cool. I had the idea of using its output to drive a PLL to patch with another VCO so I could derive a V/OCT signal, to use with a bandpass filter on the original signal (whew!) but that’s pretty indirect and unreliable, especially if you set it to more than one oscillator.

One thing I did a couple of times was run a VCO through it, then feed its output back through an FM input of that VCO, and record that VCO and Panharmonium as a mid/side pair. Fun but kind of gimmicky and I wouldn’t want to do it all the time.

2 Likes

No, but still interested. Thanks for sharing that.

If I’ve ever got the cash for one I’ll try to demo beforehand… definitely know what you mean about the Rossum demos!

Did anyone used the panharmonium with a live input? I would like to use it in combination with w/ and flutes but I am not sure yet about how that would end up with latency and stuff.

At fastest processing speed, the latency is in the chorus/flanging range. I have patched around the issue by delaying the dry signal with d0 and mixing panharmonium full wet with the d0 full wet. The need for an external delay and mixer to accommodate the processing latency is a big bummer and I feel like they could have designed around it.

Hmmm thats a shame :frowning: