In theory, I agree with those statements. In practice, being the subject of that “personality”'s apparent contempt or dismissal doesn’t feel good.
i also recognize that I’m not in a great emotional state today and probably took it more personally than it was meant. And that there was some miscommunication going on there, and a couple of other posts probably put the Xaoc person on the defensive a bit.
Based on the initial information we were given, I had a prediction for what the module could do – both in terms of exciting original concepts and features, and replacing older designs.
In my head, I figured out how I’d implement such a thing. And it was awesome. It had most of the features I wanted in that physical layout, and was easy to use. I could save 10HP and have more, cooler, better envelopes in the bargain.
And then it turns out there’s one limitation of the module that prevents it from replacing older designs as well as holding back its potential for the new stuff. It seemed like arbitrary stubbornness on the designer’s part. Sure that’s their prerogative, but it felt like they had designed this awesome new car but it can only drive backwards.
And then: posts that were dismissive of ADSRs for being “crude” and outdated (implying there was something wrong with people preferring those), that sustained envelopes were “against the main concept”, and comparing wanting to replace modules to “war”.
So, yeah. It wasn’t a happy day, and felt like an extra slap when people applauded them for that.