thank you, the new alphabetical list looks great!!
yeah as i was looking at it i thought the left column could be narrower, and sure enough the reason is grid ops. i agree it would be good to shorten them somehow, but maybe we could find a way to do so without affecting readability. my concern with non descriptive names is it will mean jumping back and forth between the op and the description a lot, which is especially bad for ops with lots of parameters.
maybe i could shorten them a bit without affecting readability? so instead of:
G.FDX id x y w h type level script columns rows
it could be
G.FDX id x y w h typ lev scr col row
also would be good to split jf/telex descriptions into short and long descriptions - something like
JF.QT x takes a lot of space in the alphabetical list right now. perhaps somebody could volunteer to go over them and change?