I’ve been having some thoughts about replacing my TT with more hands-on modules. I like TT and it’s super flexible, but I seem to have this psychological speed bump to using it – I feel like I have to “turn it on” separately from the rest of my rack.
I realized today this is really less of a “music vs code” mental state, and more because I’m using a crummy KVM switch. It’s just a passive USB switch and it takes my PC several seconds to recognize the keyboard, during which the DAW loses audio. It’s so awkward I avoid doing it!
So I ordered a better switch (with hotkey switching and keyboard emulation), and have been doing some experiments with TT to remind myself of its algorithmic sequencing power and fun 
This one started as an attempt to replicate half the Omiindustriies DDSR, but mutated into a nice little bit for Rings. Script 3 feeds the shift register with an odd-length Euclidean pattern under knob control, script 1 performs the shift, script 2 creates a CV from the register (according to the Euclidean rhythm), and script 4 is a reset/mute.
I:
M 140
M:
$ 3
$ 1
$ 2
3:
B WRAP + 1 B 0 16
D / PARAM 961
IF EZ D: $ 4
C ER D 17 B
1:
A TR 3
TR 4 TR 3
TR 3 TR 2
TR 2 TR 1
TR 1 ^ A C
2:
IF EZ C: BREAK
I * TR 1 N 3
I + I * TR 2 N 5
I + I * TR 3 N 7
I + I * TR 4 N 12
CV 1 I
4:
B 0
C 0
TR 1 0
I patched CV 1 to Rings V/OCT, left Strum unpatched so it triggers on note changes, and used the four SR gates to modulate Brightness, Damping, Structure and Position a little.
I was getting some pretty nice results, but after recording it realized it was a little dull to listen to for several minutes without key changes or anything. So if I come back to this, I’ll move the values in script 2 into a table and maybe sequence key changes with a trigger in script 5
I’d also consider changing the parameter scaling since the better values for ER hits tend to be lower numbers.